Cloud Governance Structure
Cloud infrastructure requires a dedicated governance structure that coordinates platform engineering, security, finance, and application teams. This framework focuses on cloud resource optimization, security compliance, and cost management.
Cloud Governance Committee
| Role |
Responsibility |
Meeting Attendance |
| VP of Platform Engineering |
Strategic direction, platform standards |
All meetings |
| Cloud Architecture Lead |
Technical standards, multi-cloud strategy |
All meetings |
| FinOps Manager |
Cost optimization, budget management |
All meetings |
| Cloud Security Lead |
Security standards, compliance monitoring |
All meetings |
| SRE Manager |
Reliability standards, capacity planning |
All meetings |
Meeting Cadence
- Weekly: Cloud Operations Review (SRE Manager chairs)
- Monthly: Cloud Governance Committee (VP Platform Engineering chairs)
- Quarterly: FinOps Review with Finance leadership
Cloud Data Ownership Matrix
Cloud data ownership follows a shared responsibility model where platform teams manage infrastructure while application teams manage workloads.
Cloud Account Ownership
| Aspect |
Owner |
Details |
| Data Steward |
Cloud Architecture Lead |
Accountable for account inventory |
| Source Systems |
Cloud Provider APIs |
AWS Organizations, Azure Management, GCP Resource Manager |
| Update Authority |
Platform Engineering |
Finance for cost center updates |
| Validation Owner |
Account Owners |
Verify cost center and classification |
Kubernetes Resources Ownership
| Object Type |
Data Steward |
Update Authority |
| Kubernetes Cluster |
Platform Engineering Lead |
Platform Engineering |
| Namespace |
Cluster Administrator |
Application Teams |
| Deployment |
Application Team Lead |
Application Teams via GitOps |
| Service Mesh |
Platform Engineering Lead |
Platform Engineering |
Data Quality Rules
Cloud data quality directly impacts cost optimization, security posture, and operational effectiveness.
Cloud Account Validation
| Rule |
Action on Failure |
Priority |
| Account ID format valid (12 digits for AWS) |
Reject import; flag for review |
Critical |
| Cost Center populated for non-sandbox |
Flag for finance review |
Critical |
| Monthly Spend updated within 7 days |
Update from billing API |
High |
| Owner populated for active accounts |
Assign to Cloud Architecture Lead |
High |
Kubernetes Version Compliance
| Rule |
Action on Failure |
Priority |
| Version populated for active clusters |
Flag for discovery update |
Critical |
| Version within support window (N-2) |
Schedule upgrade |
High |
| GitOps Repo required for production |
Block production deployments |
High |
Review Cadences
Daily Operations
| Activity |
Owner |
Deliverable |
| Cost anomaly review |
FinOps Team |
Anomaly alerts triaged |
| Deployment health check |
SRE Team |
Failed deployments escalated |
| Cluster status verification |
Platform Engineering |
Cluster issues identified |
Weekly Reviews
| Activity |
Day |
Deliverable |
| Cloud Operations Review |
Monday |
Weekly status, planned changes |
| Version compliance audit |
Tuesday |
Upgrade queue prioritized |
| Namespace utilization review |
Wednesday |
Quota adjustments identified |
| Cost trend analysis |
Friday |
Weekly cost report |
FinOps Integration
FinOps practices ensure cloud financial accountability and optimization within the governance framework.
Cost Visibility
- Account-Level Tracking: Monthly Spend updated daily from cloud billing APIs
- Namespace Cost Attribution: Kubernetes costs attributed via labels
- Variance Alerts: 10%, 25%, 50% increase thresholds
Cost Allocation Model
- Shared Platform Costs: Allocated by namespace utilization
- Direct Costs: Charged to resource owner's cost center
- Untagged Resources: Charged to Cloud Architecture for triage
FinOps Best Practice: All Cloud Accounts must have Cost Center assigned. Accounts without Cost Center cannot be included in financial reports.
Optimization Practices
- Rightsizing: Monthly review of instance utilization
- Reserved Capacity: Quarterly RI/Savings Plan review
- Waste Elimination: Orphaned resource detection and cleanup
Escalation Procedures
Cost Anomaly Escalation
| Threshold |
Action |
Timeline |
| 10% daily increase |
FinOps reviews, notifies account owner |
4 hours |
| 25% daily increase |
Escalate to Platform Engineering |
2 hours |
| 50% daily increase |
Emergency review, potential shutdown |
1 hour |
| Budget 100% exceeded |
Escalate to Cloud Governance Committee |
Immediate |
Security Escalation
| Issue |
Severity |
Timeline |
| Public storage bucket detected |
Critical |
1 hour |
| Missing encryption |
High |
24 hours |
| mTLS disabled (production) |
High |
24 hours |
| Cluster version outdated |
Medium |
7 days |